{"id":9260,"date":"2010-05-24T07:25:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-23T23:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/?p=9260"},"modified":"2018-03-14T11:10:44","modified_gmt":"2018-03-14T03:10:44","slug":"robin-hood","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/2010\/05\/24\/robin-hood\/","title":{"rendered":"Robin Hood"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0px 10px 10px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;\" title=\"blog-robin-01\" src=\"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/05\/blogrobin01.jpg\" alt=\"blog-robin-01\" width=\"203\" height=\"300\" align=\"right\" border=\"0\" \/> Robin Hood<\/em><\/strong> (2010) &#8211; at AMK Hub. I\u2019ve always enjoyed Ridley Scott\u2019s films, especially his string of Middle-East set of epics that started with <em>Gladiator<\/em> in 2000, and followed by <em>Black Hawk Down<\/em>, <em>Kingdom of Heaven<\/em> and finally <em>Body of Lies<\/em>. His luck might have just run out finally though, because his interpretation of the legendary English hero Robin Hood has received decidedly mixed reviews, with more \u2018nays\u2019 than \u2018ayes\u2019 among critics.<\/p>\n<p>In Scott\u2019s retelling, Robin Longstride (Russell Crowe) is a common archer in King Richard Lionheart\u2019s army. Upon the good king\u2019s untimely demise and the subsequent wiping of his royal guard and loyal retainer Sir Robert Loxley by the French agent Godfrey (Mark Strong), Longstride agrees to impersonate Loxley to return the dying knight\u2019s sword to his father (Max von Sydow) who resides with the Lady Marion (Cate Blanchett). King Richard\u2019s arrogant and sniveling brother, Prince John, is elevated to king and begins enforcing murderous taxes to replenish the kingdom\u2019s treasury \u2013 while King Philip of France acting through Godfrey plans for an invasion of England.<\/p>\n<p>The title of the film is a misnomer. Because the film is about Robin Longstride <em>becoming <\/em>Robin Hood and not about the legendary character himself. But while it\u2019s an origin story, it\u2019s not quite like the other films recounting superhero origins like in <em>Batman Begins<\/em> or the first of Sam Raimi\u2019s <em>Spider-Man<\/em> films. Robin only becomes the guy with the hood in the <em>last <\/em>few minutes of the film. And the film even goes on to teasingly tell you &#8216;so the legend begins\u2019 just before the credits roll.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s where the problem really is. The film purports to ground itself with some degree of historical accuracy \u2013 like the signing of the Magna Carta or Richard Lionheart\u2019s demise \u2013 but it doesn\u2019t feel anything like the kind of Robin Hood film we\u2019ve come to know and love over the years. The Robin here does everything typical of a medieval action hero and nothing of the legend. He doesn\u2019t have very many merry men \u2013 just three of them in fact, he meets Little John over a game of chance instead of over fists and staffs over a stream, no robbing of the rich for the poor, and Maid Marion has turned into Widow Marion, and even clads herself in dominatrix-styled <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">plate<\/span> armor.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the film feels more like a <em>Gladiator <\/em>advanced by about a thousand years and set in England instead of Rome. Crowe even shows up with his same gravely voice, Maximus hair-cut and beard. You could swap the Robin Hood character in his film for some other entirely fictional persona and little else would had needed to be changed.<\/p>\n<p>For want of a better descriptor, the new Robin Hood film just isn\u2019t fun. It\u2019s downright serious replete with a lofty theme &#8211; the Frenchies are invading England, and the only person who can do anything about it is Robin \u2013 and more subplots than you could shake a stick at. And some of those subplots are unnecessary (that scene with Prince John\u2019s first wife before he gets in with the French hottie princess), others never resolved satisfactorily (the stupid sword), and yet others that just don\u2019t make sense (how Prince John suddenly finds out about Robin\u2019s impersonation of Robert Loxley). As campy as Kevin Costner\u2019s <em>Prince of Thieves<\/em> was 19 years ago, at least the latter was entertaining, irreverent and chuckle-worthy at many places.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s also the ridiculous scene of French troops landing on England\u2019s south coast at the obligatory big battle scene towards <em>Robin Hood<\/em>\u2019s end. You\u2019ve seen it all before \u2013 <em>Saving Private Ryan<\/em> \u2013 but you\u2019d be forgiven into thinking that the 12th century French invented amphibious invasions using <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Higgins_boat\">Higgins-styled landing craft<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p>It\u2019s not a total loss though. Scott\u2019s 12th century England is a feast for the senses. Lots of detail in the backdrop of everyday life during the Dark Ages, you get a terrifically thick story, and lots of characters which fortunately are distinct enough to be individually recognized. Ling at least liked the film.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m assuming that Scott had intended this film to be a prequel to a series of films. Truth is, with this USD237 million film not being quite the critical success, whether there\u2019s going to be a sequel at all about the actual legend might now be in doubt. Crowe isn\u2019t getting any younger either at 46, and how many of us really want to watch a 50 year old Robin if there\u2019s going to be a second film.<\/p>\n<p>All that said, Scott routinely puts out extended editions of his films. The theatrical edition of <em>Kingdom of Heaven<\/em> suffered from some of the same flaws as <em>Robin Hood<\/em> has, but the director\u2019s cut of the former was a much more cohesive viewing experience. Here\u2019s to hoping we\u2019ll see the same for this <em>Robin Hood <\/em>film, and about the actual legend this time too.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/star.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/star.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/blankstar.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/blankstar.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/blankstar.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Robin Hood (2010) &#8211; at AMK Hub. I\u2019ve always enjoyed Ridley Scott\u2019s films, especially his string of Middle-East set of epics that started with Gladiator in 2000, and followed by Black Hawk Down, Kingdom of Heaven and finally Body of<\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-read-more\"><a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/2010\/05\/24\/robin-hood\/\">Read More<span class=\"cleanwp-sr-only\">  Robin Hood<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-entertainment","wpcat-10-id"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chekyang.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}